您当前使用的浏览器无法支持HTML5, 因此只能使用JScript呈现部分要素。 但很抱歉您浏览器中的脚本功能已经关闭。您必须开启脚本功能, 才能完整显示此页面。
#Culture
The EU’s Crack Down on Fast Fashion
An ambition to push the needle
Updated: 2022.08.08
4 min read · Intermediate
material_image
The EU’s Crack Down on Fast Fashion

The European Union has proposed new rules in order to tighten its grip [1] on the fast fashion industry.

In March 2022, the EU revealed a new strategy and a set of rules to make sustainable textiles the norm. The proposals set out a vision to ensure that by 2030, all textile products placed on the EU market are “long-lived and recyclable” as well as safe and produced “in respect of social rights and the environment.”

The Commission elaborated in their announcement that consumers would benefit from high-quality textiles as well as reuse and repair services made widely available. “It’s time to end the model of ‘take, make, break, and throw away that is so harmful to our planet, our health, and our economy,” EU executive vice-president Frans Timmermans said in a press conference.

Specific measures of the deal include eco-design requirements for textiles, increased transparency, and a mandatory producer responsibility scheme.

The proposals come as part of a wider push by the EU to fight for a more sustainable future. Last year the bloc unveiled [2] a sweeping plan to cut its contribution to climate change by half in a decade. But the new rules proposed in March target an industry that has become known for selling mass-produced, cheap garments: fast fashion.

Fast fashion is low-cost clothing produced rapidly by copying high fashion trends. It is in fact a recent innovation, as the term was first used in the early 90s to describe Zara’s strategy to take less than 15 days from design to sales. Today, Zara, UNIQLO, and H&M are leading the market, many of which are based in the European Union.

Fast fashion might have made each piece of clothing more affordable, but its environmental impacts have come to the fore [3] in recent years. The mass production of garments takes up 10% of humanity’s carbon footprint. What’s more, consumers in 2014 bought 60% more garments than they did in 2000. Much of this goes to the dump; in the US, about 85% of used textiles are dumped in landfills or incinerators, according to the US National Institute of Standards and Technology.

The materials used to lower the cost are problematic as well. Many brands use synthetic [4] textiles like polyester, nylon, and acrylic. Even washing these clothes releases 500,000 tons of microfibers, or 50 billion plastic bottles, into the ocean each year. A 2017 report found that an estimated 35% of all microplastics in the ocean come from washing synthetic fibers.

But the Bloc’s plan to promote sustainable fashion hinges on [5] the compliance of overseas manufacturers. Europe is one of the world’s largest textile importers, and many of the garments consumed within its borders are sourced from Asian factories.

Many aspects of modern life are known to negatively affect the environment; such aspects include flying overseas or using plastic. Some of these activities are considered necessary. That said, fast fashion and its impact might have grown disproportionately to affect our lives and future generations. The EU has an ambition to tackle some of the harm that has been done, but only the coming years will tell whether this will remain an ambition or develop into something more.

패스트패션 업계에 칼을 겨눈 유럽연합

유럽연합이 패스트패션업계에 대한 관리를 강화하는 새로운 규정안들을 마련했습니다.

2022년 3월 유럽연합은 지속가능성 있는 섬유 사용을 업계의 표준으로 하는 일련의 새로운 정책과 규정을 발표했습니다. 이 안은 2030년까지 유럽연합 내에서 거래되는 모든 섬유제품은 “수명이 길고 재활용이 가능”해야 하는 것은 물론, 안전하면서도 “사회적 권리와 환경을 존중하면서” 생산되어야 한다는 비전을 내걸고 있습니다.

유럽연합 집행위원회는 발표안에서 소비자들은 앞으로 좋은 품질의 섬유제품은 물론. 널리 보급될 제품 재사용과 수선 서비스의 혜택을 받게 될 것이라고 부연 설명했습니다. “우리의 지구, 우리의 건강 그리고 우리의 경제에 심각한 해를 끼치는 ‘가져와서 만들고, 망가뜨리고, 버리는’ 모델을 끝내야 할 때가 왔습니다.” 집행위 부총재 프란스 팀머만스가 기자회견에서 한 말입니다.

이번 정책의 구체적인 방안에는 직물의 친환경 디자인, 업계 투명성의 증진, 생산업체의 책임감있는 계획의 의무화 등이 포함됩니다.

이번 제안은 유럽연합이 보다 지속가능성 있는 미래를 위해 다방면으로 강력 추진하고 있는 사업의 일환입니다. 작년에 유럽연합은 10년 내로 환경변화에 기여하는 요인을 절반으로 감소하기 위한 광범위한 계획을 발표한 바 있습니다. 하지만 3월에 발표된 이 새로운 규칙은 값싼 의류를 대량생산해서 판매하는 패스트패션을 직접 겨냥한 것입니다.

패스트패션은 고급 패션계의 유행을 모방해서 빠르고 값싸게 생산 공급되는 의류를 말합니다. 이 분야는 사실 최근에 생겨난 것으로 이 용어는 90년대 초 의류의 디자인에서부터 판매까지 걸리는 시일이 15일을 넘기지 않는다는 자라의 전략을 지칭하는 것으로 처음 사용되었습니다. 오늘날 자라, 유니클로, H&M이 이 시장을 선도하고 있으며, 많은 업체들이 유럽연합국에 기반을 두고 있습니다.

패스트패션이 의류제품의 가격을 낮추는데 일조해왔지만, 이 산업이 환경에 미치는 영향이 최근 들어 심각한 문제로 떠오르게 되었습니다. 의류제품의 대량 생산은 인류 전체 탄소발자국의 10퍼센트를 차지합니다. 게다가 2014년 소비자들은 2000년에 비해 60퍼센트나 더 많은 의류를 구매했습니다. 이 대부분은 결국 쓰레기장으로 갑니다. 미국 국립표준기술연구소에 따르면 미국에서 중고 섬유제품의 약 85퍼센트가 쓰레기 매립지나 소각장에 버려진다고 합니다.

가격을 낮추기 위해 사용되는 재료 또한 문제가 됩니다. 많은 의류업체들은 폴리에스터, 나일론, 아크릴과 같은 인조섬유를 사용합니다. 이런 섬유를 세탁하는 것만도 50만 톤의 마이크로파이버– 500억 개의 플라스틱 물병에 상당하는 양–를 바다로 흘려보냅니다. 2017년 자료에 따르면 바다에 있는 소형 플라스틱의 약 35퍼센트가 인조섬유의 세탁에서 나온다고 합니다.

하지만 유럽연합의 지속가능한 패션업계를 위한 계획은 해외 제조업체들의 협조 여부에 달려 있습니다. 유럽은 세계에서 가장 큰 섬유제품 수입국 중의 하나이며 유럽에서 소비되는 의류제품의 대부분은 아시아에 있는 공장에서 조달됩니다.

많은 현대인의 생활 방식이 환경에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 알려져 있습니다. 해외로 여행을 하거나 플라스틱을 사용하는 것 등이 그렇습니다. 이 중 몇 활동들은 필수적이라고 여겨집니다. 그러나 패스트패션과 그것이 미치는 영향은 균형이 안 맞게 성장해서 우리의 삶과 미래 세대를 위협하고 있습니다. 유럽연합은 이러한 해악에 정면도전하겠다는 야망을 가지고 있지만 이것이 그저 야망에 그칠지 아니면 그것을 넘어 가시적인 결과를 낼 수 있을지는 앞으로 지켜보아야 할 것입니다.

Discussion Questions
Q1
In your own words, please briefly summarize the article.
Q2
Why did you choose this topic for today’s class discussion?
Q3
What do you think of the EU’s plan to crack down on fast fashion? Should the EU’s plan be adopted by other countries?
Q4
Where do you get most of your clothes? Do you buy a lot from fast fashion brands, like UNIQLO or H&M?
Q5
Do you think that all fashion products should be sustainably made?
Q6
How important is sustainability when you’re buying clothes? Do you often notice if a product is “sustainable”?
Q7
Should everyone make it a point to buy sustainable clothes? If so, what is the biggest obstacle blocking people from buying all sustainable clothes?
Q8
If you have a question or questions that you'd like to discuss during your class, please write them down.
Expressions
tighten its grip
to hold something more firmly or securely
例句
1

Since taking power, the military government has gradually tightened its grip on the state, so much so that dissent is now a punishable offense.

例句
2

He tightened his grip on my arm, making me wince.

unveil
remove a veil or covering from, especially uncover (a new monument or work of art) as part of a public ceremony
例句
1

The company is this week expected to unveil its plans.

例句
2

Following his apparent demise, Gotham unveiled a statue of Batman to commemorate their dark knight’s sacrifice to the city.

come to the fore
something moving to a place of prominence
例句
1

The issue of disabled people came to the forefront during our engaging conversation.

例句
2

She’s a fantastic leader; she always comes to the fore whenever a natural disaster hits, helping people rebuild and get back on their feet.

synthetic
related to or involving synthesis, the combining of different elements
例句
1

On the bottle it says this juice is “natural,” but if you look at the ingredients, it is in fact full of synthetic chemicals.

例句
2

The long-term health effects of many of these synthetic compounds are unknown.

hinges on
to be determined or decided (by something); to depend (on something) to be successful
例句
1

The prosecution’s argument hinges on the testimony of a single witness.

例句
2

The company’s future hinges on the upcoming promotional event.

본 교재는 당사 편집진이 제작하는 링글의 자산으로 저작권법에 의해 보호됩니다. 링글 플랫폼 외에서 자료를 활용하시는 경우 당사와 사전 협의가 필요합니다.

The European Union has proposed new rules in order to tighten its grip [1] on the fast fashion industry.

In March 2022, the EU revealed a new strategy and a set of rules to make sustainable textiles the norm. The proposals set out a vision to ensure that by 2030, all textile products placed on the EU market are “long-lived and recyclable” as well as safe and produced “in respect of social rights and the environment.”

The Commission elaborated in their announcement that consumers would benefit from high-quality textiles as well as reuse and repair services made widely available. “It’s time to end the model of ‘take, make, break, and throw away that is so harmful to our planet, our health, and our economy,” EU executive vice-president Frans Timmermans said in a press conference.

Specific measures of the deal include eco-design requirements for textiles, increased transparency, and a mandatory producer responsibility scheme.

The proposals come as part of a wider push by the EU to fight for a more sustainable future. Last year the bloc unveiled [2] a sweeping plan to cut its contribution to climate change by half in a decade. But the new rules proposed in March target an industry that has become known for selling mass-produced, cheap garments: fast fashion.

Fast fashion is low-cost clothing produced rapidly by copying high fashion trends. It is in fact a recent innovation, as the term was first used in the early 90s to describe Zara’s strategy to take less than 15 days from design to sales. Today, Zara, UNIQLO, and H&M are leading the market, many of which are based in the European Union.

Fast fashion might have made each piece of clothing more affordable, but its environmental impacts have come to the fore [3] in recent years. The mass production of garments takes up 10% of humanity’s carbon footprint. What’s more, consumers in 2014 bought 60% more garments than they did in 2000. Much of this goes to the dump; in the US, about 85% of used textiles are dumped in landfills or incinerators, according to the US National Institute of Standards and Technology.

The materials used to lower the cost are problematic as well. Many brands use synthetic [4] textiles like polyester, nylon, and acrylic. Even washing these clothes releases 500,000 tons of microfibers, or 50 billion plastic bottles, into the ocean each year. A 2017 report found that an estimated 35% of all microplastics in the ocean come from washing synthetic fibers.

But the Bloc’s plan to promote sustainable fashion hinges on [5] the compliance of overseas manufacturers. Europe is one of the world’s largest textile importers, and many of the garments consumed within its borders are sourced from Asian factories.

Many aspects of modern life are known to negatively affect the environment; such aspects include flying overseas or using plastic. Some of these activities are considered necessary. That said, fast fashion and its impact might have grown disproportionately to affect our lives and future generations. The EU has an ambition to tackle some of the harm that has been done, but only the coming years will tell whether this will remain an ambition or develop into something more.

*本教材是专爲使用Ringle学习英文的学员设计。